Constrictive pericarditis

Article written and reviewed by Dr Luca Moretti

The constrictive pericarditis is a syndrome in which the pericardium pathologically limits cardiac filling, producing elevated venous pressures and reduced ability to increase cardiac output. The substrate may be fibrotic, adherent, and calcified, but it may also be predominantly inflammatory and potentially reversible. Diagnosis is therefore functional: it does not coincide with the finding of calcification or thickening and cannot be excluded merely because pericardial thickness appears normal.

The condition belongs among causes of predominantly diastolic heart failure and may present with substantial systemic congestion despite a preserved ejection fraction. Distinction from restrictive cardiomyopathy is crucial because in the latter the limitation arises mainly from the myocardium, whereas in constriction the pericardial constraint may be correctable. The two conditions may nevertheless coexist, particularly after radiotherapy or in the presence of associated heart disease.

The distribution of causes varies with geography, access to care, and case mix: in high-income countries, idiopathic, postsurgical, and radiation-induced forms are relevant, whereas tuberculosis retains a greater role in endemic areas. Frequencies in surgical series do not represent incidence in the general population. chronic pericarditis and constriction are not equivalent; in the effusive-constrictive form a fluid collection and pericardial constraint simultaneously contribute to impaired filling.

Etiology, predisposing factors, and anatomopathologic substrate

Any pericardial injury capable of causing loss of elasticity can theoretically progress to constriction, but the probability varies greatly according to the cause. Idiopathic or presumed viral forms carry a low risk after an acute episode, whereas purulent and tuberculous infections are more often associated with organization, adhesions, and fibrosis. Multiple idiopathic recurrences do not automatically imply progressive stiffening of the sac. It is therefore more informative to reconstruct etiology, findings, and hemodynamic consequences than merely to count painful attacks.

The cardiac surgery may precede disease by months or years. Inflammation, blood within the cavity, injury to serosal surfaces, and subsequent organization contribute in varying proportions. Not all postoperative adhesions are hemodynamically relevant, and thickening observed after surgery does not constitute a diagnosis of constriction. Assessment must distinguish pericardial constraint from ventricular dysfunction, residual valve disease, ischemia, and abnormalities of septal motion related to surgery itself. These conditions can mimic or accompany constrictive physiology.

The thoracic radiotherapy can cause microvascular injury, inflammation, and fibrosis after a long latency. Involvement is not necessarily confined to the pericardium: myocardium, coronary arteries, and valves may be affected simultaneously. A person with a history of irradiation and congestion may therefore have mixed disease in which removal of the sac does not correct every mechanism of heart failure. Dose, irradiated field, timing of treatment, and other oncologic therapies are part of the clinical history needed to interpret the picture, without any single datum predicting outcome by itself.

The tuberculosis may cause granulomatous pericarditis with exudate, organization, and progressive reduction in compliance. In non-tuberculous bacterial infections, pus, fibrin, and loculations promote injury and adhesions, especially when source control is delayed or incomplete. Autoimmune diseases, uremia, trauma, neoplasia, and other iatrogenic causes complete the spectrum. Etiologic investigation should be selective: high epidemiologic risk justifies investigations different from those required in a patient with a clear postoperative sequence and no infectious signs.

Distinguishing predisposing factors from manifestations prevents conceptual errors. Previous surgery, irradiation, immunosuppression, and systemic disease modify the probability of causes. Thickening, calcification, jugular venous distension, and ascites are instead findings or consequences. Delay in recognition may worsen organ damage and surgical risk, but does not identify the original cause. Absence of a remembered acute episode does not exclude constriction: some forms begin slowly, with symptoms dominated by congestion rather than pain.

In the fibroadhesive substrate, organization of exudate, fibroblast activation, and matrix deposition reduce sliding and expansibility of the layers. The surfaces may fuse, while calcification may appear in variable areas. Constraint may be diffuse or regional, involve the parietal and visceral pericardium to different degrees, and be associated with compartmentalized collections. The structure is not always a uniformly thick shell: adhesions and elastic abnormalities can generate significant obstruction without a major macroscopic increase in thickness.

Some patients instead have transient constriction, in which edema, inflammation, and temporary reduction in compliance predominate over established scar. It may occur during resolution of pericarditis or after procedures and may regress spontaneously or with appropriate treatment. Recognition requires integration of inflammatory activity, imaging, and temporal course. Short duration makes reversibility plausible but does not guarantee it; extensive calcification suggests structural injury without excluding a superimposed inflammatory component.

Anatomic study does not replace functional correlation. The series by Talreja and colleagues in patients with constriction and normal histologic thickness documents that apparently minor morphologic abnormalities do not negate the hemodynamic diagnosis. The opposite finding is equally important: incidental calcifications and thickening after radiotherapy or surgery may occur without constriction. Therapeutic decisions must therefore be based on a demonstrated link between the pericardium and impaired filling, not on the impressive appearance of a single image.

Pathophysiology of filling and congestion

The normal pericardium allows variations in cardiac volume within a reserve of distensibility. In constriction this reserve is reduced and the heart operates within a constrained total volume. Blood enters rapidly early in diastole because of the atrioventricular gradient and myocardial relaxation that may remain preserved, but expansion soon reaches the limit imposed by the envelope. Filling then slows abruptly despite elevated atrial pressures. Difficulty increasing stroke volume becomes particularly evident during exertion.

The first distinctive mechanism is pressure dissociation between the thorax and cardiac chambers. During inspiration, intrathoracic pressure falls and this change is transmitted to the pulmonary veins; the heart enclosed by a poorly compliant pericardium does not receive the same change fully. The gradient driving blood from the pulmonary veins toward the left heart decreases, reducing left ventricular filling. In pure myocardial restriction, by contrast, transmission of thoracic pressure changes is relatively preserved and the gradient changes less. It is this dynamic difference, more than elevated pressure alone, that supports the distinction.

The second mechanism is exaggerated ventricular interdependence. Because total cardiac volume is limited, increased right-sided filling occurs at the expense of space available to the left ventricle. During inspiration the septum tends to shift leftward; during expiration the relationship reverses. This produces reciprocal variations in atrioventricular flows and ventricular systolic pressures. The phenomenon is not simply an abnormality of septal motion: it expresses respiratory competition between the ventricles within the pericardial constraint.

Elevated atrial pressure and rapid early filling produce a prominent y descent in the venous and right atrial pressure contour. In ventricular tracings, an early-diastolic pressure fall followed by a plateau creates the dip-and-plateau, also called the square-root sign. These findings describe diastolic dynamics but are not specific: they may appear in restrictive cardiomyopathies and other conditions. In pure tamponade, by contrast, filling is impaired more continuously and the y descent tends to be attenuated. An effusive-constrictive form may change appearance after drainage, when the residual constraint becomes evident.

The tendency toward equalization of pressures during diastole reflects the influence of a common external limitation, but is neither mandatory nor sufficient for diagnosis. Regional differences, volume status, pulmonary pressure, and associated myocardial disease can modify the tracings. Right atrial and right ventricular end-diastolic pressures may also be substantially elevated without extreme pulmonary hypertension. High pulmonary artery pressures do not automatically exclude constriction: they require consideration of left-heart disease, pulmonary disease, or a mixed phenotype.

Elevated systemic venous pressure results in organ congestion. In the liver, pressure is transmitted to the sinusoids, promoting hepatomegaly, ascites, and in advanced courses congestive fibrosis. In the kidney, elevated venous pressure and reduced perfusion gradient may impair filtration. In the intestine, edema and impaired lymphatic drainage may cause malabsorption and protein loss. Hypoalbuminemia, reduced food intake, and catabolism contribute to loss of muscle mass, while fluid retention may mask weight loss.

The Kussmaul sign results from the inability of the right-sided circulation to adequately accommodate the increased inspiratory venous return: jugular venous pressure fails to fall as expected or rises. It is not specific because it may occur in restriction, right-sided heart failure, and other conditions. Pulsus paradoxus is less constant than in tamponade, although it may be present in phenotypes with effusion or marked interdependence. The physiology therefore does not correspond to a set of signs that are always simultaneous; loading conditions and the predominant component modify what is observed at the bedside.

The myocardium may initially maintain relatively preserved contractility and relaxation. For this reason, the medial mitral annular longitudinal velocity may remain normal or elevated despite high filling pressures. In advanced disease, radiation-induced forms, or associated heart disease, myocardial function may be impaired and make findings less typical. The pathophysiology thus explains both the potential benefit of removing the constraint and the limits of that benefit when there is intrinsic injury that cannot be corrected by pericardial surgery alone.

Clinical manifestations, history, and physical examination

The most common presentation is a progressive reduction in functional capacity, with fatigue, exertional dyspnea, and fluid retention. Onset may be insidious and the person may gradually adapt activities, delaying recognition. It is useful to ask which exertions were possible months earlier, whether evening edema has developed, and whether weight changes rapidly. Chest pain may be absent in fibrotic forms, whereas fever and pleuritic pain suggest an inflammatory component that remains active or a specific cause.

The abdominal symptoms may predominate: ascites, tightness, early satiety, poor appetite, and pain from hepatic distension. A patient may initially be referred for evaluation of cirrhosis without jugular venous pressure having been assessed. Cardiac congestion and primary liver disease may nevertheless coexist. The relationship among ascites, edema, venous signs, and cardiac function helps reconstruct the mechanism. A reported normal ejection fraction is not sufficient to exclude a cardiac cause of fluid retention.

The history seeks causal antecedents even when remote: cardiac procedures, mediastinal radiotherapy, pericarditis, tuberculosis, thoracic infections, trauma, renal failure, and immune-mediated diseases. Diuretic doses and response, previous drainages, and changes in exercise capacity are documented. A response to diuresis supports the existence of congestion but does not distinguish constriction from other causes of heart failure. Symptoms of ischemia, valve disease, or arrhythmia should be identified because they may indicate associated conditions that change the strategy.

The jugular venous pressure is often elevated and is one of the most useful findings when assessed correctly. Venous descents may be rapid and Kussmaul sign may be evident. Abdominojugular reflux documents difficulty accommodating an increase in venous return without by itself identifying the cause. Blood pressure, pulse, perfusion, and signs of low output are assessed. In severely congested patients, simple observation in a semirecumbent position may underestimate the venous level if the column extends above the visible field.

On auscultation, a pericardial knock may be present, an early-diastolic sound associated with abrupt cessation of ventricular expansion. It must be distinguished from a third heart sound and valvular sounds; its absence does not exclude disease. A friction rub points toward activity of the serosal surfaces but may be absent even when magnetic resonance imaging shows inflammation. The lungs may be relatively free of crackles despite substantial systemic congestion. Pleural effusions, especially in the context of elevated venous pressure, may contribute to dyspnea and the radiographic picture.

Examination of the abdomen and limbs looks for hepatomegaly, ascites, and edema, while nutritional assessment looks for muscle loss, frailty, and reduced strength. Skin signs attributed to liver disease should be interpreted together with investigations because prolonged congestion and primary disease may overlap. Tachycardia may compensate for limited stroke volume; atrial fibrillation may instead worsen symptoms through loss of atrial contraction and irregular filling. Rhythm should therefore be considered part of the clinical physiology.

In advanced cases, hypotension and hypoperfusion, worsening renal function, hyponatremia, and inability to maintain adequate nutritional intake are assessed. These signs change urgency and risk even in the absence of pulmonary edema. Rapid deterioration suggests a complication, new arrhythmia, increasing collection, or a concomitant condition. Long disease duration should not lead to considering every deterioration inevitable: some injury may be reversible if the mechanism is recognized and treated before organ reserve is lost.

Echocardiographic diagnosis and multimodality imaging

The Doppler echocardiography is the reference initial examination because it links anatomy and function. Suspicion arises from congestive symptoms and consistent findings and is then tested by looking for the mechanisms of constriction. Biventricular function, atrial size, inferior vena cava, collections, and valves are described. A preserved ejection fraction, dilated atria, or a poorly collapsible vena cava are compatible but nonspecific findings. Simply visualizing a bright or apparently thick pericardium is technically limited and should not become the basis of diagnosis.

The respiratory septal motion reflects competition between the ventricles: during inspiration the septum shifts leftward, whereas during expiration the left ventricle regains space. It may be associated with abrupt early-diastolic motion commonly called a septal bounce. The two phenomena are not perfectly equivalent. Septal abnormalities after surgery, bundle branch block, or pacing may mimic part of the appearance without reproducing the full hemodynamic pattern. Recording respiration and observing several cycles help distinguish a respiratory abnormality from simple dyssynchrony.

The Mayo Clinic criteria validated by Welch and colleagues integrate septal motion, tissue Doppler, and hepatic venous flow. In the validation cohort, respiration-related septal shift associated with at least one of the other two major findings achieved sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 91%; the presence of all three increased specificity while reducing sensitivity. These are performance measures from a selected study, not guarantees applicable to every population or technical quality.

Validated echocardiographic combination for diagnosis of constriction according to the Mayo criteria.

• Respiration-related interventricular septal shift.
• Medial mitral annular early-diastolic velocity, e', at least 9 cm/s.
• Ratio of expiratory diastolic reversal velocity to forward diastolic velocity in the hepatic veins at least 0.79.

The most useful combination requires the septal finding together with preserved or increased medial e', or the stated hepatic venous ratio. Values must be obtained with appropriate technique and interpreted in the clinical context. Associated myocardial disease, arrhythmia, loading conditions, and signal quality can modify them. The list does not justify diagnosing constriction on the basis of a single abnormal velocity in a patient without a compatible picture, nor categorically excluding it when one sign is absent.

The transmitral flow may show an inspiratory reduction in E velocity greater than 25%, with reciprocal changes in tricuspid flow, often greater than 40%. These traditional thresholds are supportive findings. Very high left atrial pressure may attenuate mitral variation; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with large thoracic pressure swings may accentuate it without constriction. In atrial fibrillation, variable cycle length requires comparison of appropriate beats. Positive-pressure ventilation changes respiratory relationships and prevents mechanical application of rules derived from spontaneous breathing.

On tissue Doppler, preservation of medial e' reflects relatively preserved longitudinal relaxation. Lateral constraint may reduce lateral e' relative to medial e', producing annulus reversus. The E/e' ratio may remain relatively low despite high filling pressures, a phenomenon described as annulus paradoxus: usual algorithms for pressure estimation therefore cannot be transferred without caution. These findings become less distinct when concomitant myocardial injury is present. A low e' does not exclude a constrictive component in mixed heart disease.

The expiratory diastolic reversal in the hepatic veins is an important sign of impaired right-sided filling during expiration. It should be distinguished from predominantly systolic reversal associated with significant tricuspid regurgitation. Doppler quality, correct identification of phases, and respiratory correlation are essential. A dilated vena cava without this analysis indicates only elevated right-sided pressure. Diagnostic value comes from concordance among several expressions of the same mechanism, not from accumulation of nonspecific findings.

The cardiothoracic CT defines the extent and distribution of calcifications, thickening, and collections, as well as relationships with chambers and adjacent structures. It is useful for surgical planning and for searching for thoracic or neoplastic lesions. Calcifications may also be visible on radiography, whose normality does not exclude disease. CT mainly describes the anatomic substrate; demonstrating constriction requires functional correlation. An examination without calcifications does not justify stopping the investigation when hemodynamic data are convincing.

The magnetic resonance imaging assesses thickness, edema, pericardial LGE, and myocardial injury. Cine sequences during free breathing can show ventricular interdependence and septal shift; dedicated techniques may contribute to assessment of adhesions. Edema and enhancement, together with clinical markers, suggest a potentially treatable inflammatory component. LGE alone does not demonstrate reversibility and may persist after control. The main role of multimodality imaging is to integrate complementary questions: whether constriction is present, which substrate sustains it, and how much the myocardium contributes to symptoms.

Invasive hemodynamics and distinction from restrictive cardiomyopathy

The cardiac catheterization is indicated when noninvasive data are discordant or insufficient, especially if the decision concerns pericardiectomy. It is not mandatory in every case already clearly defined by imaging, but can resolve uncertainties with important consequences. The examination should be designed to assess respiratory interactions, not merely collect mean pressures. Volume status, respiration, sedation, ventilation, and rhythm must be recorded because they modify what is measured. A patient markedly depleted by diuretics may show less evident findings.

The static findings include elevated right atrial pressure, rapid venous descents, dip-and-plateau, and a tendency toward similar diastolic pressures among the chambers. A difference between ventricular end-diastolic pressures within approximately 5 mmHg is a traditional criterion, but has limited specificity and may be absent in regional or mixed variants. A relatively high right ventricular end-diastolic pressure compared with systolic pressure is also only a supportive element. Tamponade and restriction may share some of these features, making a diagnosis based on equalization alone inadequate.

Simultaneous measurement of ventricular pressures during respiration is more informative. In constriction, inspiration tends to increase right ventricular filling and systolic pressure while reducing left-sided filling and pressure; during expiration the opposite occurs. This respiratory discordance reflects exaggerated interdependence. In myocardial restriction, systolic changes instead tend to be concordant because both chambers are affected more uniformly by intrathoracic changes. Comparison should involve appropriate cycles and simultaneous measurements, avoiding false discordance caused by different beats or an arrhythmia.

The relationship between pulmonary capillary pressure and left ventricular diastolic pressure may document the inspiratory reduction in the left-sided filling gradient. Wedge pressure reflects thoracic pressure variation more than the intracavitary pressure of the constrained heart. This finding should also be interpreted with attention to correct catheter position, transmission delay, and pulmonary disease. Indices quantifying variation in ventricular systolic pressure-time areas can increase accuracy in experienced laboratories, but do not replace technically correct acquisition.

In restrictive cardiomyopathy the main problem is increased myocardial stiffness. Annular velocities are more often reduced, respiratory interdependence less marked, and tissue signs of infiltration or fibrosis may emerge. Magnetic resonance imaging and targeted testing may identify amyloidosis or other diseases, without a single echocardiographic parameter demonstrating the etiology. Relatively elevated natriuretic peptides may support a myocardial component, but renal function, atrial fibrillation, and other factors produce overlap: no isolated value separates the two conditions with certainty.

Significant tricuspid regurgitation can cause congestion, a dilated vena cava, and hepatic flow reversals. Temporal analysis distinguishes the systolic reversal typical of regurgitation from the expiratory diastolic component more suggestive of constriction. Right-sided heart failure from pulmonary hypertension or pulmonary disease may produce Kussmaul sign and chamber dilation but has a different relationship between pressure and respiration. Effusion with tamponade instead produces a predominantly fluid constraint with different diastolic dynamics, although some respiratory variations are shared.

Among mixed phenotypes are radiation injury, concomitant heart disease, and regional constriction. In these situations, behavior may not perfectly match textbook patterns and pericardiectomy may correct only part of the problem. The clinical question is not necessarily to choose a single label, but to estimate how much external constraint contributes to failure. Integrated assessment avoids both denying a surgical opportunity because of an atypical finding and proposing surgery when limitation is predominantly myocardial.

Definition of etiology, reversibility, and preoperative assessment

A convincing functional diagnosis must be completed by searching for a treatable cause. A history of surgery or radiotherapy is suggestive but does not exclude concomitant disease. Fever, weight loss, tuberculosis exposure, immunosuppression, and thoracic findings may require microbiology, imaging, and possibly sampling. Autoantibodies and other rheumatologic tests are selected when clinical clues are present, avoiding indiscriminate panels. In neoplastic forms, prognosis and strategy depend on the oncologic disease and not only on the technical possibility of freeing the heart.

The reversibility is estimated by integrating onset, inflammatory activity, morphology, and severity. A recent history, elevated CRP, and pericardial edema make a transient component plausible; a long history of congestion with fibrosis and extensive calcification suggests established structural disease. None of these elements is absolute. The most important test, when it is safe to wait, is change under treatment in symptoms, venous pressure, and Doppler physiology. Reduction in pain or CRP without improvement in filling does not demonstrate that the constraint has resolved.

The myocardial and valvular assessment is particularly relevant in radiation-induced and postsurgical forms. Ventricular function, valve disease, coronary perfusion, and arrhythmias may require additional investigations and sometimes a combined operative strategy. Coronary assessment is selected according to age, symptoms, risk, and planned surgery, rather than prescribed identically for everyone. Reduced ejection fraction or major myocardial injury on magnetic resonance imaging does not automatically make pericardiectomy futile, but changes expected benefit and the risk discussion.

Assessment includes renal and hepatic function, electrolytes, albumin, hematologic status, and coagulation. Renal injury may be hemodynamic, drug-related, or pre-existing; hepatic congestion may range from reversible abnormalities to advanced fibrosis. Ascites alone is not sufficient to establish irreversible cirrhosis and must be interpreted with the other data. Malnutrition and sarcopenia are important even in patients with high body weight because of edema. Reasonable optimization of volume status and nutrition may improve reserve without becoming a reason to indefinitely delay correction of the mechanism that is impairing them.

The anatomic planning uses CT and other imaging to locate calcifications, collections, previous grafts, chambers, and structures at risk. After previous surgery, re-entry and dissection may be more complex; in strongly adherent pericardia, risk of myocardial or coronary injury increases. The visceral component must be considered because parietal resection incomplete relative to the true constraint may leave residual physiology. The technically achievable extent and any need for cardiopulmonary bypass are issues to be discussed by an experienced cardiac surgical team.

The overall risk is estimated according to the individual and the center, not through a single historical percentage. Etiology, functional class, organ damage, ventricular function, and comorbidities influence mortality and recovery. Observational series, including that of Bertog and colleagues, show the impact of cause and cardiac and systemic conditions on outcomes after pericardiectomy. A multidisciplinary assessment should clarify which proportion of symptoms is correctable and which problems may persist. This precision is particularly important in mixed forms, in which freeing the pericardium is not equivalent to normalizing the entire cardiovascular system.

Medical treatment and pericardiectomy

The choice between medical and surgical treatment derives from the distinction between reversible inflammation and established constraint. When the patient is stable and there is evidence of activity, a period of anti-inflammatory therapy with scheduled reassessment is reasonable. Contemporary recommendations allow an assessment over approximately three to six months in appropriate transient forms, but clinical monitoring should occur sooner and worsening may require an earlier change. This window is not a mandatory waiting period for patients who develop severe congestion, low output, or progressive organ injury.

Treatment of pericardial inflammation may include aspirin or NSAIDs and colchicine, adapted to renal function, bleeding risk, and comorbidities. Anti-inflammatory dose and subsequent tapering depend on activity, while colchicine is maintained according to the course of associated pericarditis. Corticosteroids or anti-interleukin-1 drugs have a role in selected phenotypes, especially when uncontrolled inflammatory disease coexists. They are not treatments capable of dissolving calcification or guaranteeing recovery of mature fibrosis. A diagnosis of constriction without evidence of activity does not by itself justify increasing immunosuppression.

Response should be measured by physiology. Reduction in venous pressure, edema, improved exercise capacity, and improvement in Doppler findings are sought in addition to normalization of inflammatory markers. Lower fluid retention achieved with high-dose diuretics may temporarily mask the constraint. Conversely, progressive functional improvement with reduced diuretic requirement supports reversibility. Decisions about subsequent treatment should integrate these data, avoiding having a single image or isolated CRP determine the entire strategy.

The diuretics, especially loop diuretics, relieve systemic congestion and may be necessary as a bridge to surgery or when surgery is not feasible. Dosing must respect the dependence of filling on preload: excessive depletion may reduce output and renal function. Weight, symptoms, blood pressure, creatinine, and electrolytes are monitored, adapting sodium and fluid intake to the context. Drugs used in myocardial heart failure do not directly correct the pericardial constraint and are used for their own indications or concomitant disease, not as substitutes for mechanical correction.

The etiologic treatment is essential in infections and systemic disease. Tuberculosis requires an appropriate antimycobacterial regimen; a purulent form requires antibiotics and source control. Any additional immunomodulation depends on etiology and context and is not universal. Management of autoimmune or oncologic disease may modify inflammation but does not always resolve already fibrotic constriction. After previous radiotherapy, coronary, valvular, or myocardial lesions contributing to the clinical picture must also be treated.

The pericardiectomy is the reference treatment for persistent symptomatic nonreversible constriction in a patient with a reasonable expected benefit. Referral should be considered before prolonged congestion, cachexia, and organ failure make the operation more hazardous. Symptom severity, extent of limitation, and clinical course matter more than the mere presence of calcium. In mild stable forms or when risk is disproportionate, the choice may differ; in mixed forms, the correctable component must be estimated explicitly. Treatment should be performed at centers with dedicated experience.

The surgical goal is a broad release of constraining surfaces compatible with the safety of adjacent structures. Resection limited to the anterior portion may leave residual constriction if diaphragmatic, lateral, or posterior surfaces are involved. Extent is planned according to the case while protecting the phrenic nerves, coronary arteries, and myocardium. Adherent calcifications may make dissection difficult; the need to remove a visceral component requires particular expertise. The term radical describes a goal of functional completeness, not an invitation to hazardous resections regardless of anatomy.

The cardiopulmonary bypass is not required in every operation, but may be useful or indispensable in selected conditions, for instability, complex dissection, or concomitant cardiac procedures. The decision belongs to the operative strategy and cannot be reduced to a universal preference. Samples are sent for histologic examination and, when suspicion requires it, for microbiology, with material planned correctly before fixation. A tissue diagnosis may clarify the cause, but a nonspecific fibrotic finding does not invalidate the preoperative hemodynamic demonstration.

After release, hemodynamic recovery may be rapid or gradual. A right ventricle suddenly exposed to greater venous return may dilate and show transient dysfunction; pre-existing myocardial injury, atrophy from prolonged constraint, or loading changes may contribute to low output. Monitoring, careful fluid management, and support as needed are required. Persistent congestion immediately after surgery does not necessarily mean failure, but requires distinction among adaptation, myocardial disease, incomplete resection, and other complications.

During follow-up venous pressure, diuretic requirement, renal and hepatic function, rhythm, and exercise capacity are assessed. Nutritional and physical recovery may take time, especially after a long history of ascites and sarcopenia. Echocardiography is compared with the preoperative picture without expecting every parameter to normalize immediately. Persistent or recurrent symptoms require investigation for residual constriction, associated disease, or a new cause. Surgery corrects the achieved release of constraint but does not automatically erase already established systemic consequences.

Prognosis, complications, and limits of recovery

The prognosis depends on etiology, myocardial reserve, severity of congestion, and timing of treatment. Idiopathic forms selected for surgery generally have better outcomes than radiation-induced forms, in which cardiovascular injury is often more extensive. Renal failure, ventricular dysfunction, sodium abnormalities, elevated pulmonary pressure, and functional impairment are associated with less favorable outcomes in observational series. There is no single percentage valid for every pericardiectomy: population, center experience, and anatomic complexity modify risk.

Untreated progressive congestion may lead to refractory ascites, generalized edema, renal deterioration, and hepatic fibrosis. Intestinal venous stasis and lymphatic dysfunction may cause protein-losing enteropathy with hypoalbuminemia, further worsening edema. Malnutrition reduces host defenses and recovery capacity. Risk depends not only on chronological duration but on the intensity and continuity of hemodynamic impairment. Diagnosis before advanced injury develops can therefore substantially change the clinical course.

The atrial arrhythmias, particularly fibrillation and flutter, can worsen functional capacity and complicate Doppler interpretation. The rhythm- or rate-control strategy considers dependence on stroke volume and the overall clinical picture. Anticoagulation decisions require the usual balance of thromboembolic risk together with bleeding risk, any effusion, and planned surgery. Hypotension after intensification of medication or excessive diuresis should prompt consideration of reduced filling in addition to other causes of deterioration.

The operative complications include bleeding, myocardial or coronary injury, phrenic nerve injury, arrhythmias, respiratory failure, and low-output syndrome. Dense calcifications, reoperations, and extensive visceral involvement increase technical complexity. Renal function may worsen because of hypoperfusion and instability; pre-existing hepatic and nutritional abnormalities may amplify risk. Preoperative discussion should connect these risks with the benefit of removing a treatable cause of heart failure, avoiding both absolute reassurance and delay based solely on an impression of complexity.

The residual constriction may result from incomplete release or a visceral component that is difficult to remove. Persistent limitation may also depend on myocardium, valves, lungs, or organ damage and is not automatically equivalent to recurrent pericardial disease. Analysis should restart from mechanisms using imaging and, if necessary, hemodynamics. Reoperation has a different balance from the first procedure and requires accurate demonstration of a correctable target.

The functional recovery may continue for months after correction, with progressive reduction in diuretics, improved nutrition, and resumption of activity. Some advanced injuries may remain partly irreversible. In transient forms treated medically, disappearance of constrictive signs should be documented before the pathway is considered complete. Favorable prognosis consists not only of surviving surgery or normalizing a tracing, but of reducing congestion and sustainably recovering daily activities.

Bibliography
1. Schulz-Menger J et al. 2025 ESC Guidelines for the management of myocarditis and pericarditis. European Heart Journal. 2025;46(40):3952-4041.
2. Klein AL et al. Pericardial Diseases: International Position Statement on New Concepts and Advances in Multimodality Cardiac Imaging. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2024;17(8):937-988.
3. Adler Y et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). European Heart Journal. 2015;36(42):2921-2964.
4. Welch TD et al. Echocardiographic diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis: Mayo Clinic criteria. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2014;7(3):526-534.
5. Talreja DR et al. Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: novel criteria for diagnosis in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2008;51(3):315-319.
6. Talreja DR et al. Constrictive pericarditis in 26 patients with histologically normal pericardial thickness. Circulation. 2003;108(15):1852-1857.
7. Bertog SC et al. Constrictive pericarditis: etiology and cause-specific survival after pericardiectomy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2004;43(8):1445-1452.
8. Roberts WC. Pericardial heart disease: its morphologic features and its causes. Proceedings (Baylor University Medical Center). 2005;18(1):38-55.
9. Imazio M et al. Risk of constrictive pericarditis after acute pericarditis. Circulation. 2011;124(11):1270-1275.
10. Mayosi BM et al. Tuberculous pericarditis. Circulation. 2005;112(23):3608-3616.
11. Sagristà-Sauleda J et al. Purulent pericarditis: review of a 20-year experience in a general hospital. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1993;22(6):1661-1665.
12. Spodick DH. Acute cardiac tamponade. New England Journal of Medicine. 2003;349(7):684-690.
13. Sagristà-Sauleda J et al. Effusive-constrictive pericarditis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2004;350(5):469-475.
14. European Society of Cardiology. Constrictive pericarditis: role of echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. e-Journal of Cardiology Practice. 2017;15(23):online article dated November 22.